Nidhi Chandel

Profile description

When a Punjab and Haryana High Court order appears to disregard your legal rights, the feeling of helplessness can be overwhelming. Nidhi Chandel evaluates whether a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India offers a viable route to challenge that order. The lawyer examines the judgment for any substantial question of law, procedural flaw, or conflict with Supreme Court precedent, then advises on the prospects of obtaining permission to be heard by the nation’s highest court.

Special Leave Petitions are only granted at the Supreme Court’s discretion, yet a meticulously prepared petition can persuade the judges that the High Court’s decision merits review. Nidhi Chandel regularly assists clients in drafting SLPs that satisfy the exacting standards of Article 136. The lawyer structures the argument to highlight jurisdictional errors, violation of fundamental rights, or inconsistency with established Supreme Court rulings. By presenting a concise, compelling narrative, the lawyer helps the bench see why the High Court order should be set aside or modified.

The lawyer earned a Master of Laws from the National Academy of Legal Studies and a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Punjab, accumulating over thirteen years of experience in constitutional and procedural law. Early service as a research associate for a senior Supreme Court advocate exposed the lawyer to high‑profile SLPs dealing with tax, environmental, and criminal matters. Since then, the lawyer has appeared before the Supreme Court in numerous hearings, securing leave in cases where lower courts overlooked critical legal principles. Clients consistently commend the lawyer’s ability to demystify complex legal issues and provide clear, actionable advice.

The process begins with a confidential intake where every detail of the High Court judgment is dissected. A subsequent legal audit determines whether any of the three recognized grounds for leave—substantial question of law, miscarriage of justice, or conflict with Supreme Court precedent—apply. If the audit is favorable, the lawyer drafts the petition, gathers supporting affidavits, and files the document within the statutory deadline. Throughout the proceeding, the lawyer maintains regular communication, explains procedural developments, and conducts mock oral arguments to prepare the client for possible questions from the bench.

Case highlights include a recent industrial dispute where the lawyer’s SLP led the Supreme Court to quash a punitive order that threatened the closure of a factory, thereby saving hundreds of jobs, and a tax matter where the lawyer secured a stay on a confiscation order, allowing the client to continue operations while the substantive issue was resolved. While no outcome can be guaranteed, the lawyer’s diligent preparation and deep familiarity with Supreme Court jurisprudence have repeatedly turned adverse High Court rulings into successful outcomes. If you are confronting an unfavourable High Court order, a consultation with Nidhi Chandel can clarify whether filing a Special Leave Petition is the appropriate next step. The lawyer also reviews any post‑judgment remedies to ensure every possible avenue is pursued.

Law Practice Areas