Amey Srivastava

Profile description

If a decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court has adversely affected your business or personal rights, you may wonder whether the Supreme Court can intervene. Amey Srivastava focuses on filing Special Leave Petitions against High Court orders and can assess whether your case meets the strict criteria for Supreme Court review.

A Special Leave Petition is the constitutional gateway for a party to request the Supreme Court’s examination of a final High Court judgment. Amey regularly assists clients who suspect a legal error, a violation of fundamental rights, or a matter of broad public importance. By articulating precise grounds of error, jurisdictional defect, or misinterpretation, the lawyer crafts a petition that aligns with the Supreme Court’s high threshold for admission.

Amey earned a gold medal in law from the University of Delhi and later completed a postgraduate diploma in constitutional law. After a formative stint as a research associate at the Supreme Court Bar Association, the lawyer entered private practice fifteen years ago. Since then, Amey has prepared and argued more than thirty SLPs, achieving reversal or modification of High Court orders in a substantial proportion of those matters. The lawyer’s work has been acknowledged in legal seminars for its clarity and strategic depth.

The lawyer’s process starts with a line‑by‑line analysis of the High Court judgment to uncover any procedural lapse or substantive misreading. Amey then meets the client to explain the limited scope of an SLP, the likely timeline, and the strategic options available. By providing plain‑language summaries, the lawyer ensures that the client understands both the possibilities and the constraints of Supreme Court intervention.

In practice, Amey drafts concise petitions that cite relevant Supreme Court precedents and incorporate supporting affidavits. The lawyer also prepares interim relief applications, such as stays of execution, to protect the client’s interests while the petition is pending. When the matter is listed before a bench, Amey presents oral arguments that stress the core injustice and the broader impact of the High Court’s order on the client’s rights.

Recent successes include overturning a High Court decree that had imposed an onerous settlement on a small manufacturing firm, and securing a stay of a land acquisition order that threatened to displace a local community. Clients commend Amey’s ability to translate complex legal doctrines into understandable narratives and to persistently pursue relief despite procedural hurdles.

Beyond the petition stage, Amey monitors the Supreme Court’s orders for compliance and assists in executing any mandated relief. The lawyer prepares necessary affidavits, coordinates with the High Court for implementation, and advises on potential compensation claims. This hands‑on approach ensures that a favorable Supreme Court decision translates into tangible benefits for the client.

Choosing Amey Srivastava means partnering with an advocate who combines rigorous constitutional insight with a client‑focused ethic. Whether the goal is to quash a restrictive injunction, to obtain a just compensation, or to protect fundamental freedoms, the lawyer tailors a strategy designed to achieve the desired outcome. With Amey’s guidance, the path from a High Court judgment to Supreme Court relief becomes a clear, rights‑affirming journey.

Law Practice Areas